Todd v. Todd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• fact-finding requirements of section 61.08 are applicable where entitlement to alimony or amount is at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Crouch v. Crouch
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-11· cited 12×
• Marshall v. Marshall
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-09· cited 9×
• Arze v. Sadough-Arze
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-27· cited 8×
• Fisher v. Fisher
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-01-25
• Jones v. Jones
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-13

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Duncan v. Duncan
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-01-31· cited 161×
• Lowman v. Lowman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-13· cited 20×
• McClung v. McClung
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-22· cited 13×
• McCarty v. McCarty
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-12· cited 13×
• Fabre v. Levine
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-07· cited 11×
• Sency v. Sency
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-11-07· cited 11×
• Messal v. Messal
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-04· cited 10×
• Kirkland v. Kirkland
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-11· cited 8×
• Savage v. Savage
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-16· cited 8×
• Harvey v. Harvey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-24· cited 3×
• Garces v. Garces
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-07· cited 2×
• Morgenstern v. Morgenstern
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-04· cited 2×
• White v. White
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-04-26· cited 2×
• Wilson v. Wilson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-07-19· cited 2×