Messal v. Messal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It appears that the trial court relied upon the husband’s 1981 earnings, despite the husband’s uncontro-verted testimony that his higher income for that period (which included certain bonuses which had been discontinued) was no longer reflective of his current earnings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).