Savage v. Savage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that husband’s plea for partition in his complaint, though lacking a legal description of the property, substantially'complied with section 64.041, and that it should have been granted
• finding that husband’s plea for partition in his complaint, though lacking a legal description of the property, substantially complied with section 64.041, and that it should have been granted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bible v. Bible
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-14· cited 15×
• Arze v. Sadough-Arze
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-27· cited 8×
• Jessee v. Jessee
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-05· cited 6×
• Lee v. Lee
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-21· cited 6×
• Todd v. Todd
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-27· cited 6×
• Marshall v. Marshall
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-22· cited 2×
• Salazar v. Giraldo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-05-06· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• Marcoux v. Marcoux
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-02-14· cited 64×
• Rankin v. Rankin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-02-23· cited 32×
• Hiler v. Hiler
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-12-09· cited 9×
• Wynn v. Wynn
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-10-17· cited 6×
• Pantuso v. Pantuso
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-07-21· cited 2×