Todd v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a similar charge and recognizing that the “ ‘moral certainty’ language cannot be sequestered from its surroundings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lowry v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-02-11· cited 21×
• Battle v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-04-13· cited 7×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Estelle v. McGuire
  Supreme Court· 1991-12-04· cited 8,719×
• Holland v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1955-01-31· cited 3,238×
• Boyde v. California
  Supreme Court· 1990-04-23· cited 1,983×
• Victor v. Nebraska
  Supreme Court· 1994-05-16· cited 1,656×
• Cage v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1990-11-13· cited 1,172×
• State v. Aleksey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-11-13· cited 111×
• ML-Lee Acquisition Fund, L.P. v. Deloitte
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-08-11· cited 96×
• State v. Edwards
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-04-24· cited 85×
• State v. Littlejohn
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1955-11-14· cited 79×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-06-20· cited 79×
• State v. Manning
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-09· cited 50×
• State v. Todd
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-10-06· cited 36×
• State v. Charping
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-10-11· cited 25×
• Key v. Currie
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-07-08· cited 24×
• Tate v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-09-30· cited 21×