T.K. v. D.O.
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 352
Syllabus
Civil stalking protection order; menacing by stalking; R.C. 2903.214; R.C. 2903.11; abuse of discretion; pattern of conduct; knowingly; R.C. 2901.22; First Amendment. Trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting a civil stalking protection order to petitioner. Appellant repeatedly harassed and made inappropriate comments to petitioner, leading her to be in fear for her life. There was competent and credible evidence in the record that appellant acted knowingly. Appellant's actions and words are not protected speech under the First Amendment.
Judges: Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- State v. StumpfOhio Supreme Court· 1987-08-19· cited 305×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 1998-02-11· cited 46×
- Rufener v. HutsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-01· cited 23×
- Lewis v. JacobsOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-09· cited 14×
- In re E.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-10· cited 11×
- M.J.W. v. T.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-05· cited 10×
- Z.J. v. R.M.Ohio Supreme Court· 2025-12-23· cited 6×
- R.W.B. v. T.V.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-15· cited 4×
- In re R.K.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-09· cited 3×
- J.B. v. O.S.Y.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.