Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 709 N.E.2d 1245
  • 126 Ohio App. 3d 193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that stalking statute was not overbroad as it did not “criminalize a substantial amount of constitutionally protected activity” and that it validly sought to criminalize behavior which “invades another person’s privacy interests”
  • statute provided that a person is guilty of stalking when they engage in a pattern of conduct which “knowingly cause[s] another to believe that the offender will cause physical harm to the other person or cause mental distress to the other person,”
  • statute provided that a person is guilty of stalking when they engage in a pattern of conduct which “knowingly cause[s] another to believe that the offender will cause physical harm to the other person or cause mental distress to the other person,”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Donofrio, Vukovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.