Skip to main content

Titus v. State

Citations

  • 963 P.2d 258
  • 1998 Alas. LEXIS 138
  • 1998 WL 473237

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that pre-existing knowledge about a case or a defendant can constitute extraneous prejudicial information
  • explaining that pre-existing knowledge about a case or a defendant can constitute extraneous prejudicial information
  • explaining that Alaska Evidence Rule 606(b) reflects a compromise between competing values
  • noting \familiarity with x-ray technology\ as a type of general knowledge and discussing distinction between general and specific knowledge
  • noting “familiarity with x-ray technology” as a type of general knowledge and discussing distinction between general and specific knowledge
  • “[J]urors can make intelligent decisions only by drawing upon their accumulated background knowledge and experience.” (Internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matthews, Compton, Eastaugh, Fabe, Bryner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.