Skip to main content

Swain v. State

Citations

  • 817 P.2d 927
  • 1991 Alas. App. LEXIS 70
  • 1991 WL 184994

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that under the plain language of Alaska Evidence Rule 606(b), “jurors may be questioned only as to whether extraneous matters were brought to their attention, and not as to what the effect of any such matter may have been [on their deliberations]”
  • observing that Alaska Evidence Rule 606(b) was modeled after Federal Evidence Rule 606(b)
  • explaining that prohibition is based on Evidence Rule 606(b
  • defendant's conduct at a store minutes after the armed robbery of another store for which he was accused was admissible to show that he was the same man who robbed the first store

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Coats, Andrews, Mannheimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.