Skip to main content

Timmons v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 421 S.E.2d 894
  • 15 Va. App. 196
  • 9 Va. Law Rep. 351
  • 1992 Va. App. LEXIS 244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant had a fair trial on the merits despite the language in the jury instruction being too broad
  • holding that a broad definition of a firearm in a possession of a firearm statute is improper
  • stating that a statute which proscribes the possession of a “firearm” while in possession of cocaine does not include objects that merely appear to have the capability of firing when, in fact, they do not
  • stating that a statute which proscribes the possession of a \firearm\ while in possession of Cocaine does not include objects that merely appear to have the capability of firing when, in fact, they do not
  • stating that a statute which proscribes the possession of a “firearm” while in possession of cocaine does not include objects that merely appear to have the capability of firing when, in fact, they do not
  • involving Code § 18.2-308.4, prohibiting possession of “a controlled substance classified in Schedule I or II of the Drug Control Act” while simultaneous ly possessing any firearm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koontz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.