Dowdy v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Code § 18.2-279 does not require proof “that human life was, in fact, endangered”
• proof that deadly weapon has been maliciously discharged at an occupied building “relieves the Commonwealth of the burden of proving that human life was, in fact, endangered”
• Code § 18.2-279 does not require proof that “human life was, in fact, endangered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).