Rogers v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• possession of a \sawed-off shotgun\ includes inoperable shotgun because the purpose of the statute includes preventing the fear of harm engendered by display of such a weapon
• possession of a “sawed-off shotgun” includes inoperable shotgun because the purpose of the statute includes preventing the fear of harm engendered by display of such a weapon

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Armstrong v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2002-04-19· cited 141×
• Armstrong v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2001-07-31· cited 48×
• Jones v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-05-11· cited 41×
• Timmons v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-09-29· cited 26×
• Dillard v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-09-22· cited 19×
• Williams v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-11-21· cited 9×
• Jones v. Com.
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-06-21
• Sean Marquise Hughes v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2026-03-24

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Johnson v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1968-10-14· cited 114×
• Holloman v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1980-08-28· cited 84×
• Cox v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1978-01-13· cited 26×