Supreme Court of Arkansas· 3/8/1982
Tillman v. State
Citations
- 630 S.W.2d 5
- 275 Ark. 275
- 1982 Ark. LEXIS 1303
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the trial court properly admitted a witness’s opinion that a car had backed out of a driveway just before he saw it, where the witness’s observations as to the car’s position relative to the driveway and its movement provided a rational basis for his opinion
- finding that the trial court properly admitted a witness’s opinion that a car had backed out of a driveway just before he saw it, where the witness’s observations as to the car’s position relative to the driveway and as to its movement provided a rational basis for his opinion
- clear plastic bag, which appeared to contain marijuana, protruding from knapsack
- clear plastic bag protruding from knapsack
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hays, Hickman, Holt, Purtle, Dudley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Randolph WilliamsD.C. Circuit· 1987-07-07· cited 120×
- Commonwealth v. WrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1984-04-19· cited 97×
- State v. DemeterSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-06-05· cited 64×
- Coffman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1988-11-09· cited 34×
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-04-24· cited 26×
- Bohanan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-04-15· cited 23×
- Willett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-05-08· cited 21×
- Leopold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1985-07-03· cited 19×
- Winters v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2013-05-09· cited 18×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-05-11· cited 16×
- Nottingham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1989-10-11· cited 14×
- Willett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1986-06-25· cited 10×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1991-03-06· cited 8×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-12-19· cited 8×
- Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2015-10-28· cited 3×
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2003-04-30· cited 3×
- Foster v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1983-02-28· cited 2×
- in Re Fort Worth Star-Telegram Dallas Morning News CBS Stations Group of Texas LLC KXAS-TV NW Communications of Texas, Inc., on Behalf of Station KDFW Fox 4 And WFAA-TV, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2014-08-12
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 3,483×
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-01-26· cited 3,191×
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 2,561×
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-11-23· cited 1,968×
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-03-23· cited 1,905×
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,484×
- Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-06-30· cited 1,231×
- Reid v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 1,109×
- Robbins v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 503×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.