Skip to main content
C.D. California· 7/16/2009

Tibble v. Edison International

Citations

  • 639 F. Supp. 2d 1074
  • 47 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1652
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67845
  • 2009 WL 2382340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that beneficiaries “move[d] for summary judgment on the basis that [Edison] violated the terms of the Plan by failing to pay the full extent of Hewitt’s recordkeeping costs”
  • explaining that beneficiaries “move[d] for summary judgment on the basis that [Edison] violated the terms of the Plan by failing to pay the full extent of Hewitt’s recordkeeping costs”
  • holding the inclusion of sector funds is not per se imprudent
  • discussing literature arguing that “duty [under ERISA] be analyzed from an ex ante, rather than purely from an ex post perspective”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephen v. Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.