Skip to main content
· 4/3/2002

Chao v. Hall Holding Company, Inc.

Citations

  • 285 F.3d 415
  • 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2153
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 5929

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting application of the “hypothetical reasonable fiduciary” standard because doing so would “ignore” the second part of the “adequate consideration” definition, which requires that the fair market value is “determined in good faith by the trustee”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.