Thrifty-Tel, Inc. v. Bezenek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The Fourth District Court of Appeal of California stated in dicta that “[c]ourts have traditionally refused to recognize as conversion the unauthorized taking of intangible interests that are not merged with, or reflected in, something tangible.” (Citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United States v. Jones
  Supreme Court· 2012-01-23· cited 1,330×
• register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2004-01-23· cited 391×
• Intel Corp. v. Hamidi
  California Supreme Court· 2003-06-30· cited 284×
• Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Fremont General Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-02-28· cited 194×
• State Department of Health Services v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 2003-11-24· cited 154×
• Kremen v. Cohen
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-07-25· cited 120×
• Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 2010-04-29· cited 104×
• Kremen v. Cohen
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-01-22· cited 100×
• Plotnik v. Meihaus
  California Court of Appeal· 2012-08-31· cited 92×
• United States v. Ackerman
  Tenth Circuit· 2016-08-05· cited 88×
• Welco Electronics, Inc. v. Mora
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-01-23· cited 81×
• City of Industry v. City of Fillmore
  California Court of Appeal· 2011-08-10· cited 68×
• CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc.
  S.D. Ohio· 1997-02-03· cited 63×
• Hasso v. Hapke
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-06-19· cited 52×
• Thompson v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-05-22· cited 49×
• Tenet Healthsystem Desert, Inc. v. Blue Cross of California
  California Court of Appeal· 2016-03-17· cited 36×
• Hernandez v. Lopez
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-12-28· cited 35×
• Elton v. Anheuser-Busch Beverage Group, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-11-19· cited 33×
• Boon Rawd Trading International Co. v. Paleewong Trading Co.
  N.D. California· 2010-02-19· cited 32×
• In Re Apple & AT & TM Antitrust Litigation
  N.D. California· 2008-10-01· cited 31×

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Moore v. Regents of University of California
  California Supreme Court· 1990-07-09· cited 394×
• State v. Riley
  Washington Supreme Court· 1993-03-04· cited 350×
• Perdue v. Crocker National Bank
  California Supreme Court· 1985-07-18· cited 232×
• Saunders v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1994-08-16· cited 220×
• Toole v. Richardson-Merrell Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1967-06-12· cited 165×
• Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1985-11-14· cited 152×
• Cellular Plus, Inc. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1993-03-25· cited 84×
• Zaslow v. Kroenert
  California Supreme Court· 1946-12-30· cited 81×
• Smith v. County of Los Angeles
  California Court of Appeal· 1989-09-26· cited 74×
• Grinnell v. Charles Pfizer & Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1969-06-30· cited 66×
• Wilson v. Interlake Steel Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1982-08-30· cited 59×
• Payne v. Elliot
  California Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 51×
• Universal By-Products, Inc. v. City of Modesto
  California Court of Appeal· 1974-11-15· cited 50×
• Shaffer v. Debbas
  California Court of Appeal· 1993-06-14· cited 50×
• Matzan v. Eastman Kodak Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-11-10· cited 40×
• Colich & Sons v. Pacific Bell
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-02-25· cited 34×
• Schneider v. Union Oil Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-04-27· cited 27×
• Masonite Corp. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1976-12-20· cited 26×
• State v. McGraw
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1985-07-17· cited 26×
• Bondanza v. Peninsula Hospital & Medical Center
  California Supreme Court· 1979-02-08· cited 25×