Thrifty-Tel, Inc. v. Bezenek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The Fourth District Court of Appeal of California stated in dicta that “[c]ourts have traditionally refused to recognize as conversion the unauthorized taking of intangible interests that are not merged with, or reflected in, something tangible.” (Citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).