Supreme Court of South Carolina· 10/22/1990
Thrift v. State
Citations
- 397 S.E.2d 523
- 302 S.C. 535
- 1990 S.C. LEXIS 217
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding petitioner’s appellate attorney’s testimony that she reviewed the issue petitioner requested that she raise on appeal and consciously decided not to brief the issue clearly supported the PCR court’s finding that appellate counsel was not ineffective
- appellate counsel must provide effective assistance but need not raise every nonfrivolous issue presented by the record
- appellate counsel must provide effective assistance but need not raise every nonfrivolous issue presented by the record
- “[Ajppellate counsel is not required to raise every nonfrivolous issue that is presented by the record.”
- appellate counsel is not required to raise every nonfrivolous issue that is presented by the record.
- “[Ijmproper ‘pitting’ constitutes reversible error only if the accused was unfairly prejudiced.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harwell, Gregory, Chandler, Finney, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Humphries v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-08-26· cited 40×
- Tucker v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-07-23· cited 29×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-19· cited 27×
- Southerland v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-12-13· cited 24×
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-07-18· cited 23×
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-05-27· cited 18×
- Stevenson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-05-03· cited 17×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-12-10· cited 10×
- Mincey v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-05-23· cited 8×
- Wilds v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-02-05· cited 8×
- State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-12-29· cited 7×
- State v. BenningCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-12-06· cited 7×
- Tisdale v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-03-08· cited 5×
- State v. DaiseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2017-10-25· cited 4×
- Wade v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-07-13· cited 3×
- Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-02-10· cited 2×
- Samuels v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-01-12· cited 1×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court· 1985-03-18· cited 3,068×
- Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-12-04· cited 215×
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-08-27· cited 103×
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-10-14· cited 42×
- State v. SappsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-06-06· cited 14×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-12-05· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.