E.D. Wisconsin· 6/30/1998
Thoms v. ABF Freight System, Inc.
Citations
- 31 F. Supp. 2d 1119
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20939
- 1998 WL 951493
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that driver/dock laborer position did involve driving in interstate commerce because the job included delivering freight originating from out-of- state
- \The ADA does not override health and safety requirements established under other Federal laws.\
- federal safety regulations barring insulin-dependent drivers from operating commercial motor vehicles in interstate commerce are absolute, and not subject to medical examiner discretion (citing Dep’t of Transp., U.S. DOT Interpretations — May 4, 1997 § 391.41, question 3)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adelman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dennis R. Bay v. Cassens Transport CompanySeventh Circuit· 2000-05-11· cited 122×
- Richard Samson v. Federal Express CorporationEleventh Circuit· 2014-03-26· cited 36×
- Cummings v. Dean Transportation, Inc.E.D. Michigan· 2014-04-02· cited 11×
- Bower v. Federal Express Corp.W.D. Tennessee· 2001-08-21· cited 8×
- Cleary v. Federal Express Corp.E.D. Wisconsin· 2004-04-14· cited 7×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Murray, Inc.M.D. Tennessee· 2001-11-13· cited 6×
- Tinjum v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-11-19· cited 5×
- Samson v. Federal Express Corp.M.D. Florida· 2012-06-29· cited 3×
- Williams v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.S.D. Texas· 2015-09-22· cited 1×
- Bay, Dennis R. v. Cassens Transport CoSeventh Circuit· 2000-05-11
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court· 1987-04-20· cited 1,128×
- Lyle S. Chandler and Adolphus A. Maddox, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. The City of Dallas, the City of DallasFifth Circuit· 1993-11-02· cited 410×
- Cheryl A. Gile v. United Airlines, IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 1996-10-21· cited 393×
- John R. Turco v. Hoechst Celanese Corporation, Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1997-02-13· cited 188×
- Carl Daugherty v. The City of El PasoFifth Circuit· 1995-07-03· cited 166×
- Ricky Crawford v. Indiana Department of CorrectionsSeventh Circuit· 1997-06-02· cited 159×
- Contreras v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1997-07-16· cited 137×
- Evelyn R. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF INDIANAPOLIS, Defendant-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1994-12-12· cited 112×
- Kenneth W. Cochrum v. Old Ben Coal CompanySeventh Circuit· 1996-12-17· cited 108×
- James E. Matthews v. Commonwealth Edison CompanySeventh Circuit· 1998-02-05· cited 96×
- Philip Bentivegna v. United States Department of Labor, and City of Los Angeles, Real Party in InterestNinth Circuit· 1982-12-13· cited 58×
- Reginald D. Fedro v. Janet Reno, 1 Attorney General of the United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1994-04-01· cited 37×
- Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.D. Kansas· 1996-10-22· cited 35×
- Sarsycki v. United Parcel ServiceW.D. Oklahoma· 1994-08-31· cited 25×
- Bombrys v. City of ToledoN.D. Ohio· 1993-06-04· cited 20×
- Hallie Kirkingburg v. Albertson's, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1998-07-01· cited 17×
- Christopher v. Laidlaw Transit Inc.S.D. New York· 1995-10-04· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.