Skip to main content
· 5/11/2000

Dennis R. Bay v. Cassens Transport Company

Citations

  • 212 F.3d 969
  • 10 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 883
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 9625
  • 2000 WL 568326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[u]nder applicable DOT regulations, Cassens was not allowed to permit Bay to resume driving until he produced a copy of a doctor's certificate indicating he was physically qualified to drive, and nothing in the ADA purports to change that obligation.”
  • \Whether or not an individual meets the definition of a qualified individual with a disability is to be determined as of the time the employment decision was made.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Evans, Flaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.