Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 12/12/1910

Thompson v. Thompson

Citations

  • 218 U.S. 611
  • 31 S. Ct. 111
  • 54 L. Ed. 1180
  • 1910 U.S. LEXIS 2055

Syllabus

<p>At common law husband and wife were regarded as one, the legal existence of the latter during coverture being merged in that of the former.</p> <p>Statutes passed in pursuance of a more liberal and general policy of emancipation of the wife from the husband’s control differ in terms and each must be construed with a view to effectuate the legislative intent leading to its enactment.</p> <p>In construing a statute the courts must have in mind the old law and the change intended to be effected by the passage of the new.</p> <p>While by § 1155 and other sections of the Code of- the District of Columbia the common law was changed by conferring additional rights on married women and the right to sue separately for redress of wrongs concerning the same, it was not the intention of Congress to revolutionize the law governing' the relation of husband and wife between themselves.</p> <p>Under the existing statutes, a wife cannot maintain an action in the District of Columbia against the husband to recover damages for an assault and battery by him upon her person.</p> <p>While the wife may resort to the Chancery Court to protect her separate property rights, queere, and not decided, whether she alone may bring an action against the husband to protect such rights.</p>

Judges: Day, Harlan, Holmes, Hughes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

116 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.