Thompson v. Thompson
Citations
- 218 U.S. 611
- 31 S. Ct. 111
- 54 L. Ed. 1180
- 1910 U.S. LEXIS 2055
Syllabus
<p>At common law husband and wife were regarded as one, the legal existence of the latter during coverture being merged in that of the former.</p> <p>Statutes passed in pursuance of a more liberal and general policy of emancipation of the wife from the husband’s control differ in terms and each must be construed with a view to effectuate the legislative intent leading to its enactment.</p> <p>In construing a statute the courts must have in mind the old law and the change intended to be effected by the passage of the new.</p> <p>While by § 1155 and other sections of the Code of- the District of Columbia the common law was changed by conferring additional rights on married women and the right to sue separately for redress of wrongs concerning the same, it was not the intention of Congress to revolutionize the law governing' the relation of husband and wife between themselves.</p> <p>Under the existing statutes, a wife cannot maintain an action in the District of Columbia against the husband to recover damages for an assault and battery by him upon her person.</p> <p>While the wife may resort to the Chancery Court to protect her separate property rights, queere, and not decided, whether she alone may bring an action against the husband to protect such rights.</p>
Judges: Day, Harlan, Holmes, Hughes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
116 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rupert Ex Rel. Rupert v. StienneNevada Supreme Court· 1974-12-02· cited 152×
- Merenoff v. MerenoffSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1978-06-01· cited 133×
- Boblitz v. BoblitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-06-30· cited 95×
- Rogers v. Yellowstone Park CompanyIdaho Supreme Court· 1975-05-05· cited 82×
- Brown v. GosserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1953-11-20· cited 81×
- Hodes & Nauser, MDS, P.A. v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-04-26· cited 79×
- Maine v. James Maine & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1924-12-11· cited 73×
- Coffindaffer v. CoffindafferWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1978-05-16· cited 71×
- Koplik v. C. P. Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1958-05-05· cited 67×
- Self v. SelfCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-11-09· cited 66×
- In Re BriggsE.D. Michigan· 1992-07-29· cited 63×
- Brawner v. BrawnerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1959-09-14· cited 63×
- Price v. PriceTexas Supreme Court· 1987-06-24· cited 61×
- Kennedy v. CampSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1954-01-11· cited 58×
- Brandt v. KellerIllinois Supreme Court· 1952-11-20· cited 58×
- Orloff v. Los Angeles Turf Club, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1947-05-16· cited 56×
- State v. LillyOhio Supreme Court· 1999-10-20· cited 56×
- Lusby v. LusbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-07-19· cited 55×
- Smith v. SmithOregon Supreme Court· 1955-09-09· cited 54×
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Wyoming Insurance DepartmentWyoming Supreme Court· 1983-11-18· cited 51×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.