Skip to main content
· 12/2/1974

Rupert Ex Rel. Rupert v. Stienne

Citations

  • 528 P.2d 1013
  • 90 Nev. 397
  • 1974 Nev. LEXIS 408

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that this court has the power to modify or abrogate a common law cause of action; however, such power should be narrowly construed and exercised with caution
  • limiting abrogation of doctrine of interspousal immunity to motor vehicle accident tort claims
  • defendant’s duty to protect against reasonably foreseeable harm to others did not extend to the injured plaintiff
  • doctrine of interspousal immunity abrogated as “to claims arising out of motor vehicle accidents”
  • the right of a parent to sue a child in tort is without restriction or limitation
  • the right of a parent to sue a child in tort is without restriction or limitation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Batjer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.