· 12/2/1974
Rupert Ex Rel. Rupert v. Stienne
Citations
- 528 P.2d 1013
- 90 Nev. 397
- 1974 Nev. LEXIS 408
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that this court has the power to modify or abrogate a common law cause of action; however, such power should be narrowly construed and exercised with caution
- limiting abrogation of doctrine of interspousal immunity to motor vehicle accident tort claims
- defendant’s duty to protect against reasonably foreseeable harm to others did not extend to the injured plaintiff
- doctrine of interspousal immunity abrogated as “to claims arising out of motor vehicle accidents”
- the right of a parent to sue a child in tort is without restriction or limitation
- the right of a parent to sue a child in tort is without restriction or limitation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Batjer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.