Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 8/3/1984
In Re Daniel C.
Citations
- 480 A.2d 766
- 1984 Me. LEXIS 758
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that Santosky dealt only with standard by which elements in New York statute needed to be proved and citing majority of states applying “the Santosky requirement of clear and convincing evidence to whatever statutory elements the legislature has provided”
- rejecting notion that incarceration in and of itself constitutes abandonment of child, but finding sufficient evidence that father, who was repeatedly incarcerated, had willfully abandoned child and that the circumstances were unlikely to change in a reasonable time
- public policy furthered by encouraging relationship between parent and child, even when parent is incarcerated
- “The majority of cases we have reviewed simply apply the Santosky requirement of clear and convincing evidence to whatever statutory elements the legislature has provided.”
- both cases reject inferring willful abandonment from incarceration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKusick, Nichols, Roberts, Violette, Wathen, Glassman, Scolnik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Randy Scott B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1986-07-07· cited 88×
- In re D.S., In re M.H.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2014-04-25· cited 40×
- In re Doris G.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2006-12-19· cited 36×
- In re A.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-10-10· cited 34×
- In re D.C., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont· 2012-12-21· cited 31×
- In Re Annette P.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1991-04-10· cited 26×
- In re Jacob B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2008-11-13· cited 24×
- Thompson v. ThompsonIdaho Court of Appeals· 1986-01-17· cited 20×
- In Re the Infant Child SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-08-23· cited 19×
- In Re Hannah S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2016-02-18· cited 19×
- In Re Denise M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1996-01-30· cited 17×
- In Re Hope H.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1988-05-06· cited 15×
- State v. CoreauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-12-12· cited 14×
- In Re Cody T.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2009-09-01· cited 13×
- Adoption of Hali D.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2009-07-16· cited 13×
- In Re Christopher J.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1986-02-26· cited 13×
- In Re Maria C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1987-06-24· cited 10×
- In re H.C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2013-11-12· cited 10×
- In Re Sara K.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1992-07-20· cited 9×
- In Re Crystal S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-10-31· cited 9×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Harmon v. EmersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-02-13· cited 160×
- In re T.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-28· cited 111×
- State v. ROBERT H. ____Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1978-10-30· cited 67×
- In re Juvenile Appeal (83-BC)Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-01-18· cited 57×
- People in Interest of MSHSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-01-10· cited 50×
- In Interest of JLPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-07-21· cited 49×
- O.S. v. C.F.Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1983-07-29· cited 37×
- Matter of Adoption of John DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-05-20· cited 35×
- Department of Social & Health Services v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-08-24· cited 27×
- In the Interest of C.P.B.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1982-09-21· cited 23×
- Washington County Department of Social Services v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-06-23· cited 22×
- In Interest of DSNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-10-20· cited 20×
- In Re Shannon R.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1983-05-26· cited 18×
- In re L. A.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-05-20· cited 12×
- Matter of LozierIndiana Court of Appeals· 1983-09-08· cited 11×
- In Re Interest of SpradlinNebraska Supreme Court· 1983-07-15· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-10-13· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.