Wyoming Supreme Court· 8/29/2016
Miranda Rose Mraz v. State
Citations
- 2016 WY 85
- 378 P.3d 280
- 2016 Wyo. LEXIS 95
- 2016 WL 4541678
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant did not waive her claim the jury should have been given a supplemental instruction on the definition of “forgery” when she agreed with the prosecution that the jury should be referred to the instructions already given
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burke, Hill, Davis, Fox, Kautz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Farrow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2019-03-19· cited 31×
- Danell Blevins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2017-04-27· cited 29×
- Thompson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2018-01-17· cited 26×
- Martin Alan Ridinger v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2021-01-07· cited 22×
- Woods v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2017-09-20· cited 21×
- Charles Alfred Armajo v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 21×
- Sean Wayne Weston v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2019-11-07· cited 20×
- Bittleston v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2019-06-20· cited 19×
- Ronald Leroy King v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2023-04-21· cited 19×
- Mark Daniel Byerly v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2019-12-27· cited 18×
- Cody J. Tingey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2017-01-23· cited 17×
- Adam Christopher Mackley v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2021-02-22· cited 17×
- Samuel Joseph Barrett v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2022-05-25· cited 15×
- Nicholas J. Jendresen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2021-07-08· cited 15×
- Robert Arthur Huckins v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2020-02-19· cited 14×
- Bruckner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2018-05-18· cited 13×
- Hopkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2019-07-23· cited 13×
- Harnetty v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2019-02-27· cited 12×
- Phillip D. Cotney v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2022-02-01· cited 11×
- Jorge Omero Mendoza v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2021-11-17· cited 11×
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court· 1974-05-20· cited 1,945×
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 1,581×
- Thigpen v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1984-06-27· cited 173×
- United States v. Samuel Scott RaymerTenth Circuit· 1991-07-24· cited 143×
- United States v. Wiley Gene Wilson, United States of America v. Wiley Gene WilsonFourth Circuit· 2001-08-16· cited 92×
- United States v. SarracinoTenth Circuit· 2003-08-19· cited 87×
- Schreibvogel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2010-04-16· cited 71×
- Hughes v. District Attorney for AtlantaSupreme Court· 1971-04-19· cited 70×
- Granzer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2008-10-08· cited 68×
- State v. SternWyoming Supreme Court· 1974-09-16· cited 65×
- Dettloff v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2007-02-16· cited 57×
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Jeffrey A. Johnson, Appellant-Cross-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 2000-08-07· cited 53×
- United States v. Charles Lakeetoe WadeSixth Circuit· 2001-09-26· cited 51×
- Phillips v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-06-11· cited 44×
- Farmer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2005-12-21· cited 39×
- Rutti v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2004-11-08· cited 39×
- Heywood v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2007-09-19· cited 32×
- Barkell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2002-10-16· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.