Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 10/5/2000
Thomas v. West Bend Co.
Citations
- 760 A.2d 1174
- 2000 Pa. Super. 291
- 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2609
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- approving the trial court’s conclusion with respect to the proffered expert witness that “[n]either his exemplary qualifications, nor his extensive experience, nor the soundness of his methodology is sufficient to overcome the novelty of his scientific advance.”
- whenever science enters the courtroom it is critical that those persons most qualified to assess the general validity of a scientific method will have a determinative voice
- “Frye applies to scientific evidence itself, not merely to the methodology underlying such evidence.”
- no studies proving low voltage electric shock can cause cardiomyopathy
- no studies proving low voltage electric shock can cause cardiomyopathy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Joyce, Lally-Green, Beck
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Trach v. FellinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-02-11· cited 97×
- Haney v. PagnanelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-07-14· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. DaviesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-11-14· cited 9×
- Masgai v. FranklinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-11-14· cited 7×
- Riccio v. S&T ContractorsChester County Court of Common Pleas· 2001-06-22· cited 5×
- Wetzel v. ShafferDauphin County Court of Common Pleas· 2005-10-18· cited 1×
- Bielski v. BrabenderAlleghany County Court of Common Pleas· 2001-01-23
- Callum v. ScottLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2002-06-05
- Commonwealth v. HausmanLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2002-05-22
- Export Boxing & Crating Inc. v. Tech MetAlleghany County Court of Common Pleas· 2003-03-06
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationThird Circuit· 1994-10-17· cited 1,409×
- Geraldine McCULLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. H.B. FULLER COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantSecond Circuit· 1995-07-27· cited 373×
- Commonwealth v. TopaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-02-28· cited 215×
- Commonwealth v. DunkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-22· cited 162×
- United States v. Roland Addison, United States of America v. Albert Henry RaymondD.C. Circuit· 1974-06-06· cited 143×
- Commonwealth v. NazarovitchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-10-29· cited 141×
- Kachina Plywood, Inc. v. HurtSupreme Court· 1995-02-27· cited 127×
- Commonwealth v. CrewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-04-21· cited 125×
- Commonwealth v. ZookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-17· cited 102×
- Dang Vang Yia Moua Yang Xiong Maichao Vang v. Vang Xiong X. Toyed, Individually and in His Capacity as Refugee CounselorNinth Circuit· 1991-09-05· cited 86×
- Commonwealth v. BlasioliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-06-16· cited 79×
- Lappe v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.N.D. New York· 1994-07-15· cited 77×
- Hrinkevich v. HrinkevichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-11· cited 67×
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Keith Wayne Quinn, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1994-03-17· cited 63×
- Blum Ex Rel. Blum v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-12-29· cited 54×
- D'Ardenne Ex Rel. D'Ardenne v. Strawbridge & Clothier, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-05-12· cited 45×
- Staub v. Toy Factory, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-23· cited 36×
- Rogers v. OregonSupreme Court· 1993-03-08· cited 36×
Other cases named Thomas v. West Bend Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.