United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Keith Wayne Quinn, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prior convic- tion of 16 year-old is \adult\ conviction if maximum sentence imposed exceeded one year and one month, regardless of indetermi- nacy of period of imprisonment
• concluding that, where the charged acts and the other acts were of the same nature, “featured a man of [the defendant’s] approximate size” and were “close to each other in time and location,” the other acts evidence was admissible under Rule 404(b
• finding that “inconsistencies of the witnesses’ descriptions of the robber [did] not negate the probable cause” when “there was evidence independent of the descriptions connecting the defendant to illegal activity.”
• allowing evidence of a previous bank robbery in light of “significant similarities” between the two bank robberies
• finding sufficient distinctiveness where two bank robberies occurred close together in time and location, were “takeover” robberies, and were committed by a person of similar size and dress brandishing a similar weapon
• finding sufficient distinctiveness where two bank robberies occurred close together in time and location, were “takeover” robberies, and were committed by a person of similar size and dress brandishing a similar weapon

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).