Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/14/2003
Haney v. Pagnanelli
Citations
- 830 A.2d 978
- 2003 Pa. Super. 261
- 2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2073
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Post hoc [ergo propter hoc] describes the fallacy of assuming causality from temporal sequence; confusing sequence with consequence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bender, Montemuro, Meewen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Reading Radio, Inc. v. FinkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-19· cited 98×
- Commonwealth v. HarrellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-04-12· cited 70×
- Snizavich v. Rohm & Haas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-12-06· cited 54×
- Ford Ex Rel. Pringle v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-03-29· cited 17×
- M.C.M. ex rel. M.G.M. v. Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-15· cited 8×
- Lineberger v. WyethPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 2005-05-23· cited 1×
- Ratchford v. Florey Insurance AgencyLackawanna County Court of Common Pleas· 2005-03-08
- Adams v. WyethPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 2005-06-13
- McGonigle v. AnselPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 2006-02-23
- Robinson v. Wolters Kluwer Health Inc.Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 2015-05-01
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-17· cited 290×
- Toogood v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-05-29· cited 224×
- Commonwealth v. TopaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-02-28· cited 215×
- Mitzelfelt v. KamrinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-12-27· cited 170×
- Hightower-Warren v. SilkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-07-23· cited 152×
- Black v. Food Lion, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1999-03-30· cited 151×
- Commonwealth v. CrewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-04-21· cited 125×
- Woods v. BrumlopNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1962-10-04· cited 99×
- Trach v. FellinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-02-11· cited 97×
- Jones v. Harrisburg Polyclinic HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-12-15· cited 96×
- Commonwealth v. BlasioliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-06-16· cited 79×
- Long Island Jewish Medical Center v. SchonholzSupreme Court· 1996-12-02· cited 76×
- Blum v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-12-22· cited 63×
- Grandelli v. Methodist HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-05-21· cited 52×
- Boyer v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-07-01· cited 47×
- Juniata Valley Bank v. Martin Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-08-04· cited 42×
- Checchio Ex Rel. Checchio v. Frankford Hospital-Torres-Dale DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-09-22· cited 34×
- Donald C. Austin v. American Association of Neurological SurgeonsSeventh Circuit· 2001-06-12· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.