North Pacific Processors, Inc. v. City & Borough of Yakutat

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, in regards to contracts, \[clonduct is a better indicator of intent than is testimony\
• \Disagreement between the parties regarding the interpretation of a contract term does not necessarily create ambiguity.\
• “We use our independent judgment when reviewing the trial court’s interpretation of a contract. To the extent a trial court’s findings are based on extrinsic evidence, we apply the clearly erroneous standard.” (citations omitted)
• “[P]arties’ conduct after entering into [a] contract is probative of intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).