Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 63 So. 3d 55
  • 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7186
  • 2011 WL 1877729

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial court’s Richardson inquiry insufficient where court did not require State to show lack of procedural prejudice and instead, inquired only of defense counsel how the defense would be prejudiced
  • noting that trial court’s “imposing the burden on the defendant to demonstrate prejudice instead of determining the circumstances of the discovery violation and requiring the State to demonstrate lack of prejudice to the defendant, does not satisfy the procedure contemplated by Richardson”
  • applying former version of rule and finding that “[flailing to list a witness as an expert, even when the witness is listed as a Category A witness, is a discovery violation”
  • finding the state violated its discovery obligation when it listed an officer as a Category A witness but failed to designate him as an expert, and officer testified as an expert in street level drugs
  • “[I]mposing the burden on the defendant to demonstrate prejudice instead of determining the circumstances of the discovery violation and requiring the State to demonstrate lack of prejudice to the defendant, does not satisfy the procedure contemplated by Richardson.”
  • “[W]e hold that upon being notified by [defendant] of an alleged discovery violation, the trial court was required to conduct a Richardson inquiry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Polen, Gross, Damoorgian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.