Powell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing on direct appeal because the prosecutor violated the rule governing discovery by failing to disclose statements by the defendant
• “[I]t is the State’s burden to establish that a discovery violation is harmless error.”
• error preserved where discovery violation was raised during cross-examination
• “[T]he failure of the defense to depose a known witness ⅛ insufficient to overcome the state’s -failure to inform the defense of a statement made by the defendant to which the witness testifies,’ ” (quoting Rainey v. State, 596 So.2d 1295, 1296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cliff Berry, Inc. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-01-04· cited 14×
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-18· cited 13×
• Guzman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-01· cited 6×
• LASIAK v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-14· cited 3×
• Muniz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-13· cited 1×
• Z.L. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-08-30· cited 1×
• J. S. v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-07-31

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Richardson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
• State v. Schopp
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-03-23· cited 199×
• Rainey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-01· cited 11×
• Mason v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-05· cited 4×
• Kucher v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-28· cited 4×
• Charles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-10· cited 3×