Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 811 S.W.2d 201
  • 1991 WL 78900

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, under Rule 801(e)(1)(C), bolstering declarant’s identification with police testimony is permissible if declarant testifies and is subject to cross-examination concerning statement
  • holding that testimony from a detective that the complainant identified the defendant as one of several robbers was “rank hearsay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilson, Price, Cohen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.