Supreme Court of South Carolina· 8/13/2001
Thomas v. State
Citations
- 551 S.E.2d 254
- 346 S.C. 140
- 2001 S.C. LEXIS 147
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding a per se Sixth Amendment violation where attorney acted under an actual conflict of interest at the plea hearing
- finding a waiver at the onset of representation was insufficient to waive the actual conflict that arose when the State offered a married couple the option of dismissing one spouse's charges if the other spouse pled guilty to all the charges
- “An actual conflict of interest occurs where an attorney owes a duty to a party whose interests are adverse to the defendant’s.”
- “To be valid, a waiver of a conflict of interest must not only be voluntary, it must be done knowingly and intelligently.”
- “Petitioner does not have to demonstrate prejudice if there is an actual conflict of interest.”
- actual conflict of interest arose when the solicitor offered a plea bargain allowing the charge against one spouse to be dismissed if the other spouse pled guilty to trafficking the entire amount of cocaine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Toal, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lomax v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-07-28· cited 28×
- Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-12-11· cited 22×
- State v. GregorySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-04-18· cited 15×
- Staggs v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-04-02· cited 7×
- State v. SterlingSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-05-05· cited 4×
- Terry Plunk v. Ray HobbsEighth Circuit· 2013-07-03· cited 2×
- State v. ChildersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-04-12· cited 2×
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-05-13· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,389×
- John R. Hoffman v. William D. Leeke, CommissionerFourth Circuit· 1990-05-09· cited 57×
- United States v. Angela B. SwartzFourth Circuit· 1992-09-16· cited 38×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-19· cited 27×
- Duncan v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-04-30· cited 19×
- Langford v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-01· cited 15×
- Edgemon v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-02-13· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.