Langford v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• until defendant shows counsel actively represented conflicting interests, he has not established constitutional predicate for claim of ineffective assistance arising from multiple representation
• the mere possibility of a conflict of interest is insufficient to impugn a criminal conviction
• “Rules of Professional Conduct have no bearing on the constitutionality of a criminal conviction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lomax v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-07-28· cited 28×
• Jackson v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-19· cited 27×
• Jordan v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-12-11· cited 22×
• State v. Gregory
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-04-18· cited 15×
• Thomas v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-13· cited 13×
• State v. Bryant
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-05-12· cited 9×
• Padgett v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-04-07· cited 6×
• Whelchel v. Bazzle
  D. South Carolina· 2006-12-18· cited 4×
• State v. Childers
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-04-12· cited 2×
• Edgemon v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-02-13· cited 2×
• Gonzales v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-05-13· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cuyler v. Sullivan
  Supreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,389×
• Burger v. Kemp
  Supreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,706×
• Cherry v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-12-04· cited 215×
• Vance v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-07-21· cited 5×
• Goins v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-04-24· cited 1×