Skip to main content
· 2/23/1988

Thomas v. News World Communications

Citations

  • 681 F. Supp. 55
  • 15 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1065
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1308
  • 1988 WL 13769

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that calling somebody “insane” or a “pitiable lunatic[]” reflects an opinion and not fact
  • “Libel actions [under D.C. law] accrue on the date of publication.”
  • newspaper did not act under color of state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oberdorfer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.