Thomas v. New York City

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deeming answer amended for purposes of considering affirmative defense to decide a motion for judgment on the pleadings
• denying motion to dismiss third-party beneficiary claim because “the parties have not submitted the contracts”
• whether a party is a third-party beneficiary under a given contract is a mixed question of law and fact that depends on the provisions of the contract at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).