E.D. New York· 2/5/1993
Thomas v. New York City
Citations
- 814 F. Supp. 1139
- 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1408
- 1993 WL 49470
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deeming answer amended for purposes of considering affirmative defense to decide a motion for judgment on the pleadings
- denying motion to dismiss third-party beneficiary claim because “the parties have not submitted the contracts”
- whether a party is a third-party beneficiary under a given contract is a mixed question of law and fact that depends on the provisions of the contract at issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sifton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.Second Circuit· 1997-09-25· cited 138×
- McKnight v. MiddletonE.D. New York· 2010-03-29· cited 108×
- Oltremari Ex Rel. McDaniel v. Kansas Social & Rehabilitative ServiceD. Kansas· 1994-11-21· cited 96×
- Neufeld v. NeufeldS.D. New York· 1996-01-23· cited 49×
- People United for Children, Inc. v. City of New YorkS.D. New York· 2000-07-18· cited 43×
- Sobel v. PrudentiE.D. New York· 2014-06-18· cited 41×
- Alesayi Beverage Corp. v. Canada Dry Corp.S.D. New York· 1996-06-26· cited 23×
- S.W. ex rel. Marquis-Abrams v. City of New YorkE.D. New York· 2014-01-28· cited 18×
- Gomez v. StateMontana Supreme Court· 1999-04-01· cited 17×
- DeFlora Lake Development Associates, Inc. v. Hyde Park (In re DeFlora Lake Development Associates, Inc.)S.D. New York· 2017-07-19· cited 17×
- Wolff v. City of New York Financial Services AgencyS.D. New York· 1996-09-04· cited 16×
- Pinckney v. Board of Education of the Westbury Union Free School DistrictE.D. New York· 1996-04-01· cited 13×
- FELIX-TORRES v. GrahamN.D. New York· 2009-10-23· cited 13×
- Brian A. Ex Rel. Brooks v. SundquistM.D. Tennessee· 2000-10-26· cited 13×
- Ingalls v. FlorioD. New Jersey· 1997-06-13· cited 12×
- Tylena M. Ex Rel. Debra M. v. Heartshare Children's ServicesS.D. New York· 2005-09-19· cited 12×
- Levy v. LernerE.D. New York· 1994-05-26· cited 10×
- JC v. Adoption of Minor ChildMississippi Supreme Court· 2001-03-01· cited 10×
- National Westminster Bank Plc v. Grant Prideco, Inc.S.D. New York· 2003-04-29· cited 10×
- Pizzuto v. County of NassauE.D. New York· 2002-11-19· cited 9×
Cites
94 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court· 1962-12-03· cited 17,205×
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 14,568×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1989-02-28· cited 10,043×
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,564×
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court· 1985-08-14· cited 3,810×
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 3,103×
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 1,972×
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court· 1989-01-10· cited 1,911×
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court· 1987-04-06· cited 1,834×
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court· 1975-05-12· cited 1,716×
- Moore v. SimsSupreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 1,323×
- Ankenbrandt Ex Rel. L. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court· 1992-06-15· cited 1,297×
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court· 1980-05-19· cited 1,250×
- Juidice v. VailSupreme Court· 1977-03-22· cited 1,215×
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1984-06-14· cited 1,052×
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court· 1890-05-19· cited 717×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.