Ingalls v. Florio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• actual knowledge of risk of harm can be inferred from circumstantial evidence of obviousness of risk
• limited access to telephone calls is not a constitutional violation so long as inmates can communicate with their counsel in writing or in person by visits
• “[L]imited access to telephone calls . . . is not a constitutional violation so long as inmates can communicate with their counsel in writing or in person by visits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).