Rockefeller v. United States Court of Appeals Office, for the Tenth Circuit Judges

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that 18 U.S.C. §§ 242 and 371 are criminal statutes and provide no private cause of action
• finding that pro se plaintiff’s claims were precluded “because, as criminal statutes, [the cited sections] do not convey a private right of action.”
• observing that 18 U.S.C. §§ 242 and 371 are criminal statutes and provide no private cause of action
• observing that 18 U.S.C. §§ 242 and 371 are criminal statutes and provide no private cause of action
• observing that 18 U.S.C. §§ 242 and 371 are criminal statutes and provide no private cause of action
• dismissing private claims based on 18 U.S.C. § 242 because it is a criminal statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).