District of Columbia· 6/30/2011

Crummey v. Social Security Administration

Citations

794 F. Supp. 2d 46
2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70273
2011 WL 2580291

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

granting summary judgment on similar Privacy Act claim where plaintiff “failed to present even a scintilla of competent evidence suggesting that the SSA’s records are, in actuality, materially inaccurate or incomplete”
denying plaintiff’s motion to file a surreply for several reasons, including that the reply did not expand the scope of issues presented, the local rules contemplate three memoranda on a given motion and a general disfavor for Consol. Court No. 13-00100 Page 5 surreplies
“[A] surreply is not a vehicle for rehashing arguments that have already been raised and briefed by the parties.”
“The same stretched timeline (investigation completed by September 8, 2022; notation proposed over 45 days later, on October 24, 2022
surreplies permitted “when the nonmovant is deprived of the opportunity to contest matters raised for the first time in the movant’s reply”
“[B]ecause [Plaintiff] has already received all the records responsive to his requests that are in the [agency]'s possession, custody, or control, his requests for access are moot and the associated relief unavailable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Crummey v. Social Security Administration

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.