The Florida Bar v. Sibley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To the extent possible, courts have a duty to construe a statute in such a way as to avoid conflict with the Constitution.” (citing State v. Gale Distribs., 349 So. 2d 150, 153 (Fla. 1977))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Sibley
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-03-11· cited 389×
• In Re Sibley
  D.C. Circuit· 2009-05-01· cited 14×
• Estate of McCall v. United States
  N.D. Florida· 2009-09-30· cited 10×
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. JEFFREY REININGER
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-09-05· cited 5×
• Banuchi v. Department of Corrections
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-16· cited 2×
• DEDRIC GANDY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-11-27

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange Cty.
  Supreme Court· 1961-12-11· cited 433×
• State v. Gale Distributors, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-03-24· cited 51×
• Hanson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1952-01-04· cited 22×
• Sparkman v. State Ex Rel. Scott
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1952-04-22· cited 19×
• Kane v. Robbins
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-07-20· cited 10×
• Gregory v. Woodbery
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 6×
• State ex rel. Overstreet v. Andrews
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1959-07-24· cited 4×