Sparkman v. State Ex Rel. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, “Express or implied provisions of the Constitution cannot be altered, contracted or enlarged by legislative enactments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Havoco of America, Ltd. v. Hill
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-06-21· cited 111×
• Aldana v. Holub
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-02-28· cited 87×
• Bain v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-29· cited 56×
• Dade County v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-02-07· cited 23×
• Osterndorf v. Turner
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-02-03· cited 22×
• Garcia v. Andonie
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2012-10-04· cited 11×
• The Florida Bar v. Sibley
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-09-25· cited 6×
• Osterndorf v. Turner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-24· cited 4×
• In Re Lisowski
  M.D. Florida· 2008-09-23· cited 2×
• De La Mora v. Andonie
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-15· cited 2×
• In Re Heckman
  N.D. Florida· 2008-10-06· cited 1×
• Ago
  Florida Attorney General Reports· 1976-05-17
• Ago
  Florida Attorney General Reports· 1974-12-02
• Ago
  Florida Attorney General Reports· 1976-06-04
• Ago
  Florida Attorney General Reports· 1982-04-20
• Ago
  Florida Attorney General Reports· 1974-07-24
• Opinion No.
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 1978-06-20
• Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 1978-07-02

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Parks & Woolson Machine Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1932-10-17· cited 11×