Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 5/1/2009

In Re Sibley

Citations

  • 564 F.3d 1335
  • 385 U.S. App. D.C. 379
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 9421
  • 2009 WL 1162425

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that due process did not entitle a defendant in a disciplinary proceeding “to call specific witnesses in his defense”
  • rejecting argument that court’s adoption of court- appointed referee’s report amounted to deprivation of due process
  • rejecting argument that court’s adoption of court-appointed referee’s report amounted to deprivation of due process
  • rejecting argument that court’s adoption of court- 16 No. 12-70031 appointed referee’s report amounted to deprivation of due process
  • rejecting argument that court’s adoption of court- 16 No. 12-70031 appointed referee’s report amounted to deprivation of due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Tatel, Griffith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.