Texas v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Citations
- 258 U.S. 158
- 42 S. Ct. 261
- 66 L. Ed. 531
- 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2254
Syllabus
<p>1. Regarded as corporate entities created for governmental purposes, the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Railroad Labor Board are not citizens of any State. . P. 160.</p> <p>2. Abstract questions of the power of Congress to enact specified legislation do not present a case or controversy within the judicial power as defined by the Constitution. P. 162.</p> <p>3. A suit by a State against the Railroad Labor Board and the Interstate Commerce Commission, seeking to annul action taken by them under the Transportation Act of 1920, as an unconstitutional invasion of the rights of the State, injurious to her citizens, held not to be entertained by this court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction where the decisions and orders complained of had been put in execution and their annulment would directly and unavoidably affect resulting interests of carriers and carrier employees who were not parties or represented in the litigation. P. 163.</p> <p>4. That the citizenship of such necessary parties prevents their beingjoined will not justify proceeding in their absence. P. 163.</p> <p>5. A suit by a State to set aside orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission must be brought in the District Court and the United States must be made a defendant. P. 164. North Dakota v. Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co., 257 U. S. 485.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that federal agencies “are not citizens of any State, but have the same relation to one State as to another” (footnote omitted)
- the United States is not a citizen for diversity purposes and federal agencies cannot be sued in diversity under 28 U.S.C. § 1335
- “Nor can the Internal Revenue Service be subject to suit in a diversity case.”
- “Obviously the United States is not a citizen of any state.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Devanter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
81 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court· 1962-03-26· cited 6,173×
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court· 1936-02-17· cited 3,147×
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court· 1937-03-01· cited 3,033×
- United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court· 1947-02-10· cited 1,457×
- Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 1,202×
- Pennsylvania v. West VirginiaSupreme Court· 1923-06-11· cited 523×
- Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court· 1945-03-26· cited 482×
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1931-05-18· cited 301×
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court· 1933-02-06· cited 291×
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court· 1933-02-06· cited 247×
- United States v. Park Place Associates, Ltd.Ninth Circuit· 2009-04-22· cited 156×
- Weeks Construction, Inc. v. Oglala Sioux Housing Authority, United States of America, and Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentEighth Circuit· 1986-07-29· cited 132×
- Application of the President and Directors of Georgetown College, Inc., a Body CorporateD.C. Circuit· 1964-06-15· cited 123×
- Willing v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court· 1928-05-21· cited 117×
- United States v. West VirginiaSupreme Court· 1935-05-20· cited 102×
- Commercial Union Insurance Company v. United States v. William ScottD.C. Circuit· 1993-08-10· cited 99×
- Liberty Warehouse Co. v. GrannisSupreme Court· 1927-01-03· cited 87×
- Calcote v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Fifth Circuit· 1946-07-31· cited 80×
- Venner v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court· 1926-04-26· cited 79×
- Fidelity Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Kansas City v. SwopeSupreme Court· 1927-04-11· cited 65×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1911-02-20· cited 763×
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court· 1896-03-30· cited 188×
- Railroad Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court· 1922-02-27· cited 155×
- California v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court· 1895-03-18· cited 117×
- Bankers Trust Co. v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1916-05-22· cited 83×
- Georgia v. StantonSupreme Court· 1868-02-10· cited 80×
- Stearns v. WoodSupreme Court· 1915-01-18· cited 36×
- North Dakota Ex Rel. Lemke v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1922-01-23· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.