Teter v. Republic Parking System, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that clear and convincing evidence requires that truth of the facts asserted be “highly probable”
• “[B]ecause Mr. Teter did not agree to modify his existing contract and RPS would not continue to employ him under the old contract . . . Mr. Teter did not voluntarily resign his position.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).