Camp v. Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding employees’ misrepresentations about their felony convictions related directly to their wrongful termination claims; since they were not lawfully qualified for their jobs, they cannot be heard to complain that they improperly lost them.
• “[T]here cannot be a valid express contract and an implied contract, each embracing the same subject, but requiring different results.”
• “[T]here cannot be a valid express contract and an implied contract, each embracing the same subject, but requiring different results.”
• “In California, the doctrine of unclean hands may apply to legal as well as equitable claims ... and to both tort and contract remedies.” (internal citation omitted)
• “where the at-will employment relationship is terminated, the employee cannot complain about a deprivation of the benefits of continued employment, for the agreement never provided for a continuance of its benefits in the first instance.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).