· 10/13/2000
Mooney v. Sneed
Citations
- 30 S.W.3d 304
- 2000 Tenn. LEXIS 572
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a court's job in interpreting a statute is to ascertain the intention of the legislature without employing a “forced or subtle interpretation that would limit or extend the statute's application”
- holding that a court’s job in interpreting a statute is to ascertain the intention of the legislature without employing a “forced or subtle interpretation that would limit or extend the statute's application”
- holding that a court's job in interpreting a statute is to ascertain the intention of the legislature without employing a “forced or subtle interpretation that would limit or extend the statute's application”
- holding that a court's job in interpreting a statute is to ascertain the intention of the legislature without employing a “forced or subtle interpretation that would limit or extend the statute's application”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Drowota, Birch, Holder, Barker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.