First Circuit· 3/30/2009
Castillo-Diaz v. Holder
Citations
- 562 F.3d 23
- 2009 WL 806893
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where petitioner failed to report her rape to authorities, the IJ properly relied on evidence in a State Department report that El Salvador enforces its rape laws with significant penalties to conclude the country was able and willing to protect petitioner
- holding that where petitioner failed to report her rape to authorities, the IJ properly relied on evidence in a State Department report that El Salvador enforces its rape laws with significant penalties to conclude the country was able and willing to protect petitioner
- denying petition for review of a kidnapping and rape victim, in part because no police report had been filed
- reviewing factual findings for 2 1 substantial evidence and questions of law and application of 2 law to fact de novo
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boudin, Gibson, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Carlos Bringas-Rodriguez v. Jefferson SessionsNinth Circuit· 2017-03-08· cited 489×
- Diaz-Garcia v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2010-06-25· cited 29×
- Decky v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2009-11-25· cited 29×
- Sugiarto v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2009-11-10· cited 26×
- Lobo v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2012-07-06· cited 25×
- Singh v. Holder, Jr.First Circuit· 2014-04-30· cited 19×
- TASYA v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2009-07-23· cited 18×
- Khan v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2013-08-09· cited 17×
- Mejilla-Romero v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2010-04-06· cited 10×
- Khattak v. Holder, Jr.First Circuit· 2013-01-17· cited 10×
- Guaman-Loja v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2013-02-11· cited 10×
- Makieh v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2009-07-14· cited 9×
- Ye Xian Jing v. LynchFirst Circuit· 2017-01-04· cited 9×
- Dias Gomes v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2009-05-14· cited 7×
- VANCHURINA v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2010-09-08· cited 6×
- Romer v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2011-12-12· cited 6×
- De Abarca v. Holder, Jr.First Circuit· 2014-07-10· cited 6×
- Ly v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2010-07-28· cited 5×
- Aguirre v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2013-08-28· cited 4×
- Al Amiri v. RosenFirst Circuit· 2021-01-11· cited 4×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Marta Brigida Melgar De Torres v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, and the Immigration and Naturalization ServiceSecond Circuit· 1999-08-19· cited 581×
- Aguilar-Solis v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceFirst Circuit· 1999-02-26· cited 242×
- Albathani v. INSFirst Circuit· 2003-02-12· cited 204×
- Nikijuluw v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2005-10-26· cited 148×
- Romilus v. AshcroftFirst Circuit· 2004-09-16· cited 122×
- Sandra Lorena Menjivar v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States of America, 1Eighth Circuit· 2005-07-29· cited 103×
- El Moraghy v. AshcroftFirst Circuit· 2003-06-12· cited 99×
- Rodriguez-Ramirez v. AshcroftFirst Circuit· 2005-02-17· cited 68×
- Palma-Mazariegos v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2005-10-28· cited 67×
- Harutyunyan v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2005-09-02· cited 63×
- Khalil v. AshcroftFirst Circuit· 2003-07-24· cited 36×
- Afful v. AshcroftFirst Circuit· 2004-08-06· cited 24×
- Carcamo-Recinos v. AshcroftFirst Circuit· 2004-11-23· cited 22×
- Sou, Srey v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2006-06-07· cited 22×
- Liu v. MukaseyFirst Circuit· 2009-01-12· cited 21×
- Khan v. MukaseyFirst Circuit· 2008-12-05· cited 20×
- Disu v. AshcroftFirst Circuit· 2003-07-31· cited 19×
- Tendean v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2007-09-14· cited 15×
- Galicia v. AshcroftFirst Circuit· 2005-01-27· cited 12×
- Lan Zhu Pan v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2006-04-17· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.