Appellate Court of Illinois· 6/30/2000

Technology Innovation Center, Inc. v. Advanced Multiuser Technologies Corp.

Citations

732 N.E.2d 1129
315 Ill. App. 3d 238
247 Ill. Dec. 797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding allegation in plaintiff’s complaint was frivolous where factual defect was “apparent” and the plaintiffs “kn[e]w, or should have known” about the defect
affording deference to trial court's ruling on motion for Rule 137 sanctions even though court did not address each allegation of misconduct individually because it was apparent court was aware of history of case and gave consideration to allegations as a whole
while trial court’s determination is given considerable deference, reviewing court is not precluded from reviewing the record and finding abuse of discretion “if the facts warrant”
while trial court's determination is given considerable deference, reviewing court is not precluded from reviewing the record and finding abuse of discretion \if the facts warrant\
‘[w]hen reviewing a decision on a motion for sanctions, the primary consideration is whether the trial court’s decision on a motion for sanctions was informed, based on valid reasoning, and follows logically from the facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolfson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.