Technology Innovation Center, Inc. v. Advanced Multiuser Technologies Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding allegation in plaintiff’s complaint was frivolous where factual defect was “apparent” and the plaintiffs “kn[e]w, or should have known” about the defect
• affording deference to trial court's ruling on motion for Rule 137 sanctions even though court did not address each allegation of misconduct individually because it was apparent court was aware of history of case and gave consideration to allegations as a whole
• while trial court’s determination is given considerable deference, reviewing court is not precluded from reviewing the record and finding abuse of discretion “if the facts warrant”
• while trial court's determination is given considerable deference, reviewing court is not precluded from reviewing the record and finding abuse of discretion \if the facts warrant\
• ‘[w]hen reviewing a decision on a motion for sanctions, the primary consideration is whether the trial court’s decision on a motion for sanctions was informed, based on valid reasoning, and follows logically from the facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).