Christel Hager-Freeman v. Spircoff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the 4 No. 17-1999 presumption against personal representation extends even to closely held corporations
• explaining that the presumption against personal representation extends even to closely held corporations
• an attorney for a corporation, even a closely held one, does not have a fiduciary duty toward an individual shareholder
• “the attorney for a corporation, even a closely held one, does not have a specific fiduciary duty toward the individual shareholders”
• vacated dismissal of oppression in light of well-pled claims of no shareholder meetings for three years, forged records, hidden business information, secret sale of shares to obtain majority control

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).