Skip to main content
· 11/20/1986

Beer Nuts, Inc. v. Clover Club Foods Company

Citations

  • 805 F.2d 920
  • 231 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 913
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a lack of actual confusion evidence is more understandable when the products and services involved are inexpensive because purchasers are less likely to inform the trademark owner when confusion arises over such products and services
  • explaining that a lack of actual confusion evidence is more understandable when the products and services involved are inexpensive because purchasers are less likely to inform the trademark owner when confusion arises over such products and services
  • involving two directly competing companies marketing identical goods, sweetened salted peanuts, in the same manner
  • involving two directly competing companies marketing identical goods, sweetened salted peanuts, in the same manner
  • requiring proof of likelihood of confusion in action by holder of incontestable mark
  • noting the mere adoption of a similar mark can give rise to an inference of intent, where the adopting party knows of the prior mark’s existence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, McWilliams, Tacha

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.