Seventh Circuit· 2/22/2008
Tchemkou v. Mukasey
Citations
- 517 F.3d 506
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 3752
- 2008 WL 465957
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Having failed to provide any support for this argument, the Government also has failed to show that its position was substantially justified.”
- “Having failed to provide any support for this argument, the Government also has failed to show that its 3 EAJA fees can be awarded if either the government's pre-litigation conduct (the ALJ's decision
- “[G]iven the passage of time since the establishment of the hourly rate, a cost- of-living adjustment is warranted.”
- multiple lawyers performing the same task does not necessarily require that the hours must be deducted and, instead, the inquiry focuses on whether the time was \reasonably expended\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ripple, Rovner and Sykes, Circuit Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stewart v. AstrueSeventh Circuit· 2009-04-02· cited 396×
- Stephen Sprinkle v. Carolyn ColvinSeventh Circuit· 2015-01-23· cited 219×
- Schlacher v. Law Offices of Phillip J. Rotche & Associates, P.C.Seventh Circuit· 2009-08-03· cited 100×
- Gomez-Beleno v. HolderSecond Circuit· 2011-07-07· cited 38×
- Gibson v. City of ChicagoN.D. Illinois· 2012-07-06· cited 36×
- Coulter v. Gerald Family Care, P.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-01-29· cited 22×
- Gatimi v. HolderSeventh Circuit· 2010-05-17· cited 20×
- Greenhill v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-01-31· cited 17×
- Kholyavskiy v. HolderSeventh Circuit· 2009-04-03· cited 14×
- Wells v. City of ChicagoN.D. Illinois· 2013-02-20· cited 14×
- Potdar v. HolderSeventh Circuit· 2009-10-21· cited 12×
- Valerio v. Total Taxi Repair & Body Shop, LLCN.D. Illinois· 2015-03-03· cited 8×
- Stragapede v. City of EvanstonN.D. Illinois· 2016-10-19· cited 8×
- Craftwood II, Inc. v. Generac Power Systems, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2023-03-30· cited 8×
- Orantes-Hernandez v. HolderC.D. California· 2010-03-29· cited 5×
- Hakim v. Accenture United States Pension PlanN.D. Illinois· 2012-10-03· cited 5×
- Board of Educ. of City of Chicago v. WalkerN.D. Illinois· 2011-07-25· cited 3×
- Pennsylvania Chiropractic Ass'n v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Ass'nN.D. Illinois· 2014-12-17· cited 2×
- Claiborne ex rel. L.D. v. AstrueN.D. Illinois· 2012-07-06· cited 1×
- Davis, Robert v. Advocate Health PatiSeventh Circuit· 2008-04-28
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 6,197×
- Saluja Thangaraja v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2005-11-03· cited 323×
- Esther Marcus v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesSeventh Circuit· 1994-05-24· cited 173×
- Haroco, Incorporated, Roman Ceramics, Incorporated, California Originals, Incorporated v. American National Bank and Trust Company of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1994-10-19· cited 127×
- Michael E. Golembiewski v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecuritySeventh Circuit· 2004-08-31· cited 117×
- Arqile Gjerazi, Klarita Gjerazi, Alba Gjerazi, and Justin Gjerazi v. Alberto Gonzales, 1Seventh Circuit· 2006-01-30· cited 93×
- Matthew Burda v. M. Ecker CompanySeventh Circuit· 1993-08-25· cited 62×
- Maria Conrad v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartSeventh Circuit· 2006-01-19· cited 57×
- Yordanos Muhur v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2004-08-24· cited 41×
- Tchemkou v. GonzalesSeventh Circuit· 2007-07-31· cited 28×
- Floroiu v. GonzalesSeventh Circuit· 2007-08-22· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.