Yordanos Muhur v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing with Rueda-Menicucci and holding that “when a court of appeals, as in this case, reverses a denial of asylum because the denial was erroneous, and sends the case back to the immigration service for further proceedings, the applicant is a prevailing party”
• agreeing with Rueda-Menicucci and holding that “when a court of appeals, as in this case, reverses a denial of asylum because the denial was erroneous, and sends the case back to the immigration service for further proceedings, the applicant is a prevailing party”
• awarding $7,053.50 in fees and $459.52 in costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).