Skip to main content

Tazruk v. State

Citations

  • 67 P.3d 687
  • 2003 Alas. App. LEXIS 65
  • 2003 WL 1860775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “when a defendant seeks post-conviction relief based on newly discovered evidence, the defendant must meet the same test that governs motions for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence”
  • remanding unsuccessful PCR applications where the petitioner’s attorney was facially ineffective or intentionally avoided filing a no-merit certificate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.